This site was set up to detail the judicial review of the decision to end the SFO investigation into BAE-Saudi arms deals.
Now the judicial review has finished, the site will be left online for the record. It is frozen as of February 2009.
High Court reopens BAE-Saudi corruption investigation
24 April 2008
Campaigners win landmark ruling on BAE-Saudi corruption case
9 November 2007
US probe into BAE welcomed by CAAT and Corner House
26 June 2007
CAAT and Corner House respond to BAE revelations
12 June 2007
Challenge to refusal to permit judicial review
7 June 2007
Full grounds for judicial review lodged
20 April 2007
BAE admits to paying agent to investigate campaigners
18 April 2007
BAE defeated in court by CAAT
26 February 2007
Update on proposed Judicial Review
25 January 2007
Government's defence of the SFO decision received
19 January 2007
Legal challenge to decision to drop BAE corruption inquiry
19 Decemeber 2006
17 July 2007
Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) has applied to the High Court to re-list injunctive proceedings against BAE Systems concerning confidential CAAT documents that have been leaked to BAE. BAE admitted earlier this year to paying a private investigator to gather information on CAAT, but fresh evidence has revealed that BAE has been involved in further leaks.
The evidence is contained in affidavits and documents only now supplied by BAE to CAAT, but BAE is still withholding the information which would help CAAT identify the source of the leaks. BAE has refused to correspond further with CAAT, leaving CAAT with no option but once again to ask the court to intervene.
CAAT spokesperson Symon Hill said:
"CAAT is an entirely nonviolent organisation which includes thousands of people from all walks of life. In a democracy, it is essential that everyone is allowed peacefully to campaign without undue interference. It is vital to the public interest that BAE is held to account."ENDS
1. Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) works for the reduction and ultimate abolition of the international arms trade.
2. Following legal action by CAAT, BAE Systems admitted on 18 April 2007 that they had paid £2,500 per month to LigneDeux Associates, whose agent Paul Mercer passed information about CAAT to BAE's Director of Security, Mike McGinty. BAE insisted that they expected Paul Mercer to operate within the law. However, Mercer admitted providing them with a legally privileged and confidential internal CAAT document. This document concerned the impending judicial review of the Serious Fraud Office decision to end an inquiry into BAE's arms deals with Saudi Arabia.
Symon Hill (CAAT) - 020 7281 0297 or 07990 673 232